|
About Me
Mission
Statement
Contact Me
Home
Services
Bronze Subscribers
Silver Subscribers
Gold Subscribers
Platinum
Subscribers
Summary
of Subscriptions
Subscription Order Form
OHS
News
Department of Labour (DoL)
Department of Mineral & Energy (DME)
OHS Chat & Skinner Newsletters
OHS Practitioner Newsletter
Exclusive
Subscriber Newsletter
OHS Act Section 16
Employer's
Rights
OHS Act Section 37
OHS Court Cases
OHS Act
Department of Labour
ISO
Acts-on-line
SABS Website
Compensation Commissioner
ASOSH
Department
of Justice
Department
Mineral & Energy
| |
Anglo asked to waive cutoff on silicosis cases.
Cape Town - Lawyers for former gold miners who have brought damages claims
against Anglo American after the miners became ill from silicosis have asked the
company to waive time limits that could prevent thousands of others from
bringing similar claims.
Nine test cases are pending in the Johannesburg high court.
Richard Meeran, the attorney from Slater and Gordon, the Australian law firm
that is bringing the action, said yesterday that time was running out for
thousands of victims of respiratory illness who were awaiting the outcome of the
test cases.
Meeran said Anglo American could elect to enforce or waive a strict three-year
time limit on claims under South African law.
If Anglo enforced the time limit, the entitlements of thousands of injured
miners could be lost, he said.
Unlike British and Australian law, South African law did not allow any
discretion to override the three-year time limit. Class actions in the US and
Australia had the effect of suspending prescription, Meeran said.
In an open letter to Anglo, Meeran said he presumed it was not part of the legal
strategy of Anglo American to trump the critical right of the ill workers to
compensation while the test cases were in progress.
"Given the state of health and poverty of silicosis victims, such a strategy
would indeed be both immoral and cynical.
"This is especially so in view of the long-standing policy of the corporation to
effectively 'wash its hands' of responsibility for the health of miners who
develop incurable, debilitating and frequently fatal mining-related diseases
after leaving employment," Meeran said.
Silicosis usually developed between 10 and 30 years after dust exposure, he
said.
It would be in the interest of all parties and the administrative convenience of
the court for the test cases to be used for the resolution of key legal issues
in silicosis litigation, rather than a mass of litigation on behalf of each and
every individual victim, Meeran said.
In its response, Anglo said yesterday that South African legislation made
express provision for the payment of compensation for occupational diseases
through statutory compensation schemes.
The purpose of these schemes was to provide a government-administered process
for the payment of compensation to workers out of a fund to which gold mining
and other companies had for many years been contributing in accordance with
their legal obligation to do so.
Miners affected by silicosis, particularly former miners living in rural areas,
appeared to experience practical difficulties in obtaining benefit examinations,
treatment and statutory compensation benefits.
"Sensitive to these issues, representatives of the mining industry, the unions
and government are working together to find practical and sustainable solutions
to overcome these difficulties," the company said.
"Anglo American believes that this solution-oriented approach is likely to
result in a speedier and more equitable outcome for all miners affected by
silicosis than protracted and expensive litigation," it said.
More
Miners get too little compensation, says lawyer.
Cape Town - Levels of statutory compensation paid to mine workers who suffered
from occupational diseases were insufficient and made no provision for pain and
suffering, the main component of damages in personal injury claims, Richard
Meeran, a consultant attorney in compensation claims against Anglo American,
said yesterday.
Nine tests cases from former mine workers who have contracted silicosis, a
respiratory disease, have been brought against Anglo in the Johannesburg high
court. Following a judge's ruling, the papers will have to be redrafted and the
claimants allowed access to sensitive Anglo documents to prepare for the court
cases.
Meeran's law firm, Australia-based Slater & Gordon, and London-based law firm
Leigh Day & Company are consultants to the Legal Resources Centre in
Johannesburg in the litigation.
Meeran said the statutory compensation was based on earnings at the time of
work. Given that silicosis might take up to 30 years to develop, levels of
compensation were low and the system discriminated against black workers, whose
earnings were lower, he added.
Studies have shown that the majority of former miners who developed silicosis
did not in fact get compensated under the statutory scheme, primarily because
they were not diagnosed, but also because many who were diagnosed did not apply.
"As a result, the companies paying into the scheme have got off extremely
lightly at the expense of their former workers," Meeran said.
In response to comments by Anglo that it was working with trade unions and the
government to find practical and sustainable solutions to overcome difficulties
in obtaining benefit examinations, treatment and statutory compensation
benefits, Meeran said the industry had been well aware of these obstacles for a
century.
Proper solutions needed to be implemented rapidly. Workers exposed to
significant quantities of silica dust, or who had silicosis, had a greatly
increased risk of developing tuberculosis. If tuberculosis was diagnosed and
treated effectively quickly, a worker could recover. Medical care structures
needed to be developed in rural areas. This was a key underlying purpose of the
present test cases, Meeran said.
The legal representatives were "unconvinced by the industry's sense of
commitment and urgency over this serious problem".
"Any solution should be primarily paid for by the industry, given that work on
their mines is the cause of the problem. It is not right that they should be
allowed to continue to 'wash their hands' of the health of workers injured in
the interests of profit."
Silicosis victims had a right to compensation, which they were entitled to
enforce, and it was "arrogant, patronising and self-serving" for the industry
that injured them to seek to dictate how their rights should be enforced.
|