KLASS LOOCH ASSOCIATES on-line.

Occupational Health & Safety Legislation Consultants 

         Established 1986

 

Tel 0117267839 / 0825749882                                                                                                                                      Fax 0866500687 

                                                                                                               

  April 2009

 

About Me

 

 Mission Statement

 

Contact Me

 

 Home

 

Services

 

Bronze Subscribers

 

Silver Subscribers

 

Gold Subscribers 

 

 Platinum Subscribers

 

 Summary of Subscriptions

 

Subscription Order Form

 

OHS News

 

Department of Labour (DoL)

 

Department of Mineral & Energy (DME)

 

OHS Chat & Skinner Newsletters

 

OHS Practitioner Newsletter

 

 Exclusive Subscriber Newsletter

 

OHS Act Section 16

 

Employer's Rights

 

OHS Act Section 37

 

OHS Court Cases

 

OHS Act

 

Department of Labour

 

ISO

 

Acts-on-line

 

SABS Website

 

Compensation Commissioner

 

 ASOSH

 

   Department of Justice

 

 Department Mineral & Energy

 

 

Extract  from Subscriber Newsletter on Corporate Privilege

'The reason that one must venture beyond the boundaries of OHS legislation is simple. The Constitution is supreme and overrides any statute or common law provision. (A constitutional override must first be challenged in court and ultimately verified by the Constitutional Court to take effect). Any person who advises employers and users on matters of OHS law would be failing in their task if they were not always cognisant of the Constitution and its impact on certain provisions of OHS legislation. Particularly the impact that the Bill of Rights has on the rights of natural and juristic persons at judicial proceedings such as section 31 Investigations and particularly section 32 Formal Inquiries where cross-examination is allowed. (The same applies to sections 60 and 65 of the MHS Act although section 63 of the MHS Act, like the Constitution itself, does provide for limitations to be placed on these rights). Although there are various provisions in the OHS Act which are constitutionally dicey – the OHS Act having been promulgated before the Constitution was in place – the focus of this newsletter will be on evidence given or statements made by persons during investigations or formal inquiries.

Section 35(5) of the Bill of Rights states that evidence obtained in a manner that violates any right in the Bill of Rights must be excluded if the admission of that evidence would render the trial unfair or otherwise be detrimental to the administration of justice. While section 35 does deal with arrested, accused and detained persons and while sections 31 and 32 of the OHS Act are inquisitorial as opposed to accusatorial of nature, one must bear in mind that the law of privilege applies at these procedures (i.e. as if someone was an accused in a criminal court) and that the Constitution encourages the development of the common law to address issues that were previously virgin legal territory. It has long been accepted that natural persons do enjoy the right to silence and the right against self-incrimination at any of the inquisitorial procedures of OHS legislation even before the Constitution was in place. These rights were afforded in terms of the Criminal Procedure Act. (Law of Privilege)'.